Republic of China (Taiwan) Constitutional Interpretations

DATE No. Content
1.)民國51年12月19日No.99 Should a person who counterfeits or forges New Taiwan Dollars issued by the Bank of Taiwan, an agency of the Central Bank of China, be punished under the Statute Governing the Punishment for Damaging National Currency?
2.)民國51年10月17日No.98 Is the provision of the Criminal Code governing "Combined Punishment for Multiple Offenses" applicable to a defendant who committed another offense after he was convicted of those prior offenses?
3.)民國51年9月7日No.97 An administrative sanction, which is authorized by an administrative authority, is a notification whose contents include a disciplinary action. Should such administrative sanction conform to legal form or not?
4.)民國51年6月27日No.96 1. Does the conduct of offering bribes prescribed in Article 122, Paragraph 3, of the Criminal Law constitute an offense of malfeasance? 2. Is a person who engages in aiding or abetting the conduct of offering bribes considered to have committed an offense of malfeasance?
5.)民國51年2月28日No.95 Does the restriction stipulated in Article 17, Paragraph 2, of the Public Functionaries Appointment Act apply to a public servant who is guilty of derelict behavior after appointment?
6.)民國51年2月14日No.94 When civil death has been pronounced on a public servant because he has committed repeat offenses, is the punishment of dismissal from office included in civil death?
7.)民國50年12月6日No.93 Should a convenience track be considered immovable property?
8.)民國50年8月16日No.92 Is the Public Functionary Service Act is applicable to the directors and supervisors representing civilian shareholders in a state-owned enterprise?
9.)民國50年6月21日No.91 Can an adopted child marry a legitimate child of adoptive parents after the adoptive parents pass away?
10.)民國50年4月26日No.90 1. Does the term “a person in flagrante delicto” have the same meaning in the Constitution and in Article 88, Paragraphs 2 and 3, of the Criminal Procedure Code? 2. Shall the privilege granted to a private citizen to engage in hot pursuit and arrest a person in flagrante delicto without a warrant be limited to offenses undetected by officer with investigative authority? 3. Shall a bribe accepted by a public official in violation of his official duties be considered as stolen property as prescribed in Article 88, Paragraph 3, Subparagraph 2, of the Criminal Procedure Code? 4. Shall a public official who accepts a bribe in violation of his official duties be considered as a person in flagrante delicto and subject to the provisions set forth in Article 88 of the Criminal Procedure Code?
11.)民國41年10月27日No.9 Where the adjudication violates the Constitution, may the party concerned indicate such violation in the appeal statements?
12.)民國50年2月10日No.89 Which court has the jurisdiction over a dispute that arises from the revocation or dissolution of opening up of public lands for cultivation?
13.)民國49年12月21日No.88 Does the phrase “unable to register loss” mean unable to process the proceeding of public summons stipulated on the application for registration of such loss?
14.)民國49年12月9日No.87 May an adoptive relation only file for revocation or certain invalidity when Article 1073 of the Civil Code has been violated?
15.)民國49年8月15日No.86【Separation of the Judicial and the Prosecutorial Institutions Case】 Should the high courts and their subordinate courts be organizationally placed under the Judicial Yuan?
16.)民國49年2月12日No.85 Should those elected delegates who are unable to attend meetings in Taiwan be counted and included in calculating the “total number of National Assembly Delegates” as provided for in the Constitution?
17.)民國48年12月2日No.84 Should a public functionary cease his function of office when he is sentenced to civil death and probation?
18.)民國48年10月21日No.83 When a local court is located near an agential bank of the national treasury, shall the money, negotiable securities, and valuables of lodgment lodged in the court be deposited under custody of the treasury sector of the agential bank?
19.)民國48年6月17日No.82 If a person falsifies a public document under Article 212 of the Criminal Law and the public seal under Article 218 of the Criminal Law simultaneously, should he be judged only under Article 212 of the Criminal Law?
20.)民國47年12月17日No.81 Shall a member of the Control Yuan serve concurrently as a director, supervisor and manager of a privately owned enterprise?
21.)民國47年11月26日No.80 In the circumstance where a military tribunal and judicial organ have a difference of opinion over the jurisdiction of a case, how may it be settled?
22.)民國41年10月27日No.8 May the personnel who are engaged in corporate affairs of the state-owned enterprises be considered as civil servants under the Criminal Code?
23.)中華民國 109 年 06 月 19 日 院台大二字第1090017996號
24.)中華民國 109 年 05 月 29 日 院台大二字第1090015723號
25.)中華民國 109 年 03 月 20 日 院台大二字第1090007437號
26.)民國46年10月7日No.79 Does the phrase “certified” in J.Y. Interpretation No.67 refer only to a civil servant who has been certified by the Ministry of Civil Service or does it also refer to a civil servant who holds a junior rank personnel auditing post and has been certified by the Ministry of National Defense?
27.)中華民國 109 年 02 月 27 日 院台大二字第1090005410號
28.)中華民國 109 年 01 月 31 日 院台大二字第1090002245號
29.)中華民國 108 年 12 月 27 日 院台大二字第1080034835號
30.)中華民國 108 年 12 月 13 日 院台大二字第1080033573號
31.)中華民國 108 年 11 月 29 日 院台大二字第1080032005號
32.)中華民國 108 年 10 月 25 日 院台大二字第1080029189號
33.)中華民國 108 年 08 月 23 日 院台大二字第1080022779號
34.)中華民國 108 年 08 月 23 日 院台大二字第1080022778號
35.)中華民國 108 年 08 月 23 日 院台大二字第1080022777號
36.)中華民國 108 年 07 月 26 日 院台大二字第1080020771號
37.)民國46年8月9日No.78 Shall a cultivation lease be terminated before its expiration day?
38.)中華民國 108 年 07 月 05 日 院台大二字第1080018423號
39.)中華民國 108 年 06 月 14 日 院台大二字第1080016395號
40.)中華民國 108 年 05 月 31 日 院台大二字第1080015107號
41.)中華民國 108 年 04 月 12 日 院台大二字第1080010142號
42.)中華民國 108 年 02 月 22 日 院台大二字第1080005122號
43.)中華民國 108 年 01 月 11 日 院台大二字第1080001436號
44.)中華民國 107 年 12 月 28 日 院台大二字第1070035595號
45.)中華民國 107 年 12 月 28 日 院台大二字第1070035594號
46.)中華民國 107 年 12 月 14 日 院台大二字第1070033877號
47.)中華民國 107 年 11 月 30 日 院台大二字第1070032681號
48.)民國46年6月24日No.77 Does the stipulation of Article 164 of the Constitution, that the educational programs expenditure of the county/hsien shall not be less than 35 percent of the total budget, include the supplemental budget?
49.)中華民國 107 年 11 月 09 日 院台大二字第1070030742號No.769【Open Ballot System for the Election of County/City Council’s Speaker and Deputy Speaker】 Do the provisions in Articles 44 and 46 of the Local Government Act regarding the use of open ballot system for the election of county/city council’s speaker and deputy speaker comply with the spirit and intent Article 129 of the Constitution and Article 9, Paragraph 1 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution?
50.)中華民國 107 年 10 月 05 日 院台大二字第1070027524號
51.)中華民國 107 年 07 月 27 日 院台大二字第1070020895號
52.)中華民國 107 年 07 月 13 日 院台大二字第1070019477號No.766【Case regarding survivor’s pension application under the National Pension Act】 Is Article 18-1 of the National Pension Act, amended on June 29, 2011, which stipulates that the survivor’s pension is paid monthly from the month of application and meeting the requirements, in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution to protect property rights and right to existence?
53.)中華民國 107 年 06 月 15 日 院台大二字第1070016460號No.765【Sharing Expenses of Installing New Water Pipelines within the Zone Expropriation Area】 Does Article 52, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 8 of the Enforcement Rules of the Land Expropriation Act, as promulgated by the Ministry of the Interior on April 17, 2002, violate the Gesetzesvorbehalt principle?
54.)中華民國 107 年 05 月 25 日 院台大二字第1070014072號
55.)中華民國 107 年 05 月 04 日 院台大二字第1070012243號No.763【Obligation to Notify the Original Landowner of the Use of the Expropriated Land Case】 Is Article 219, Paragraph 1 of the Land Act, which does not require the competent authority to notify periodically the original landowner of the subsequent use of the expropriated land and, as a consequence, renders the original landowner unable to obtain sufficient information to exercise the right of redemption, inconsistent with the due process in administrative procedure required by the Constitution and unconstitutional for violation of Article 15 of the Constitution which guarantees the people’s right to property?
56.)中華民國 107 年 03 月 09 日 院台大二字第1070006530號No.762【The Right of a Defendant to Access Information in the Court Dossier Case】 Is the first part of Paragraph 2 of Article 33 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prevents a defendant from gaining timely access to all dossiers and exhibits in the case, unconstitutional?
57.)中華民國 107 年 02 月 09 日 院台大二字第1070004458號No.761【The Case on Recusal of Judges and Technical Examination Officers at the Intellectual Property Court】 1.Does applying mutatis mutandis the litigation procedure rules for recusal of judges to the recusal of Technical Examination Officer at the Intellectual Property Court violate the principle of statutory reservation and the principle of clarity of law? 2. Would the right to litigation protected under the Constitution be harmed if the law does not disqualify judges at the Intellectual Property Court who have heard the civil or criminal intellectual property cases from hearing the administrative litigation concerning the same intellectual property?
58.)中華民國 107 年 01 月 26 日 院台大二字第1070002941號No.760【Disparate Impact Discrimination in Police Recruitment Case】 Does Article 11, Paragraph 2 of the Police Personnel Management Act constitute disparate impact discrimination in the qualification for assignments of regular trainees who have passed the Grade Three Special Examination for Police Personnel?
59.)民國46年5月3日No.76 Shall the National Assembly, the Legislative Yuan and the Control Yuan be considered en masse as equivalent to the parliaments of democratic nations?
60.)中華民國 106 年 12 月 29 日 院台大二字第1060034641號No.759【Jurisdiction over compensation for survivors of employees in enterprises formerly owned by Taiwan Province.】 Which court shall adjudicate disputes where surviving relatives of staff employed by the former Taiwan Provincial Water Supply Company Ltd. claim survivors’ compensation?
61.)中華民國 106 年 12 月 22 日 院台大二字第1060034027號No.758【Jurisdiction when the civil law is used to request a government agency to restore land】 Should a case filed by a landowner pursuant to Article 767, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code be a dispute arising from a relationship in private law to be adjudicated by ordinary courts, not being influenced by the fact that the means of attack and defense of the two parties involve disputes arising from a relationship in public law?
62.)中華民國 106 年 12 月 15 日 院台大二字第1060033279號No.757【Supplementary Interpretation of J.Y. Interpretation No. 706】 Whether the Petitioner of J.Y. Interpretation No. 706 can directly use the payment receipt issued by the Execution Court as input tax certificate?
63.)中華民國 106 年 12 月 01 日 院台大二字第1060031846號No.756【Prisoners’ Freedom of Secrecy of Correspondence and Freedom of Expression Case】 1. Does Article 66 of the Prison Act violate the freedom of secrecy of correspondence protected under Article 12 of the Constitution? 2. Does Article 82, Subparagraphs 1, 2 and 7 of the Enforcement Rules of the Prison Act exceed the authorization of the enabling statute, namely the Prison Act? 3. Does Article 81, Paragraph 3 of the Enforcement Rules of the Prison Act violate the Gesetzesvorbehalt principle in Article 23 and freedom of expression in Article 11 of the Constitution?
64.)中華民國 106 年 12 月 01 日 院台大二字第1060031845號No.755【Judicial Remedies for Inmates Case】 According to Article 6 of the Prison Act and Article 5, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 7 of its Enforcement Rules, inmates are not allowed to seek remedies in court. Does the foregoing contradict Article 16 of the Constitution, which protects the people’s right to judicial remedy?
65.)中華民國 106 年 10 月 20 日 院台大二字第1060027920號No.754【Filing one import declaration form and the combined penalties for tax evasions】 Does filing one import declaration form to evade import duty, commodity tax, and business tax constitute one single conduct or multiple conducts? Do the combined penalties for the tax evasions violate the principle of double jeopardy embraced by a rule-of-law nation?
66.)中華民國 106 年 10 月 06 日 院台大二字第1060026835號No.753【Measures Regulating Breach of Contract Under the National Health Insurance Act Case】 1.Does the Gesetzesvorbehalt principle apply to the contract with the National Health Insurance Healthcare Providers? Do the relevant provisions of the National Health Insurance Act authorizing the Competent Authority to issue Regulations Governing Contracting and Management of National Health Insurance Medical Care Institutions (“Contracting and Management Regulations”) violate the principle of clarity and definiteness of statutory authorization? 2.Do provisions of the abovementioned Contracting and Management Regulations concerning contract suspension, refusal of reimbursement, offsets of the period of suspended contract, and deductions of medical expenses exceed the scope of authorization by the enabling statute? 3.Do provisions of the abovementioned Contracting and Management Regulations concerning contract suspension, refusal of reimbursement, and offsets of the period of suspended contract violate the principle of proportionality under the Constitution?
67.)中華民國 106 年 07 月 28 日 院台大二字第1060020314號No.752【A Defendant’s Right to Appeal a Higher Court Guilty Decision Reversing a Lower Court Not-Guilty Decision Case】 Are Article 376, Subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure unconstitutional in forbidding certain cases from being appealed to a court of third instance?
68.)中華民國 106 年 07 月 21 日 院台大二字第1060019656號No.751【Imposition of Administrative Penalty on Top of a Final Disposition of Conditional Deferred Prosecution】 1. Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Administrative Penalty Act stipulates that an administrative penalty may be imposed on top of a final disposition of conditional deferred prosecution. Is it a violation of the Constitution? Article 45, Paragraph 3 of the same Act provides that a payment made [for a conditional deferred prosecution] may be deducted from the penalty on an offense committed before the 2011 Amendment of the same Act but yet to be punished. Is it a violation of the Ex Post Facto principle or the doctrine of legitimate expectation? 2. Does [the old version of] Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Administrative Penalty Act, which took effect on February 5, 2006, apply to a final disposition of conditional deferred prosecution?
69.)中華民國 106 年 07 月 07 日 院台大二字第1060018360號No.750【Eligibility of Holder of an Overseas Degree for Taking Part in a Dentist Examination】 Are the provisions that require a graduate from an overseas department of dentistry to successfully complete training in clinical practice at a medical institution accredited by the competent authorities so as to be eligible to take part in a dentist examination unconstitutional?
70.)民國46年4月8日No.75 May a delegate to the National Assembly hold a government post concurrently?
71.)中華民國 106 年 06 月 02 日 院台大二字第1060014844號No.749【Disqualification of Taxi Drivers from Professional Practice for a Fixed Period of Time and Revocation of Their Driving Licenses】 Are the provisions in the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act that disqualify a taxi driver who was convicted of certain crimes during the time period for professional practice for a fixed period of three years and that revoke all categories of driving license held unconstitutional?
72.)中華民國 106 年 05 月 24 日 院台大二字第1060014008號No.748【Same-Sex Marriage Case】 Do the provisions of Chapter II on Marriage of Part IV on Family of the Civil Code, which do not allow two persons of the same sex to create a permanent union of intimate and exclusive nature for the purpose of living a common life, violate the Constitution’s guarantees of freedom of marriage under Article 22 and right to equality under Article 7?
73.)中華民國 106 年 03 月 17 日 院台大二字第1060007343號No.747【The landowner’s right to demand expropriation of the land surface right case】 Does the landowner have the right to request the user of his or her land to apply for expropriation of the land surface right to the competent authority, if that party carries out road construction by tunneling under or passing over the land to the extent that goes beyond the scope of social responsibility that the owner may be expected to bear, resulting in special sacrifice on the landowner?
74.)中華民國 106 年 02 月 24 日 院台大二字第1060005256號No.746【Constitutionality of imposing failure-to-pay surcharge and of imposing interests on both unpaid tax and said surcharge.】 (1) Both Article 20 of the Tax Collection Act and Article 51, Section 1 of the Estate and Gift Tax Act impose a failure-to-pay surcharge on the taxes payable but not paid on time. Are these provisions unconstitutional? (2) Ministry of Finance Letter of Tai-Tsai-Shui No.790445422 (April 8, 1991) and Letter of Tai-Tsai-Shui No. 811680291 (October 9, 1992) hold that, if a taxpayer files an administrative appeal against the amount of additional taxes payable as determined by the petition decision but does not pay one-half of such taxes until after the payment deadline, a failure-to-pay surcharge shall be imposed for that half of the taxes. Are these two Letters unconstitutional? (3) Article 51, Paragraph 2 of the Estate and Gift Tax Act provides that the interests on the taxes payable and the failure-to-pay surcharges shall accrue from the next day of the payment deadline. Is it unconstitutional？
75.)中華民國 106 年 02 月 08 日 院台大二字第1060003592號No.745【Is it unconstitutional to disallow earners of salary income to deduct the full amount of their expenses?】 （I）Is it unconstitutional to disallow earners of salary income to deduct the full amount of their expenses? （II）The letter ruling issued by the Ministry of Finance characterizes the hourly pay earned by adjunct university teachers as salary income rather than as income earned by a practitioner (zhixing yewu suode). Is this letter ruling a violation of the constitutional principle of taxation in accordance with the law?
76.)中華民國 106 年 01 月 06 日 院台大二字第1060000700號No.744【Prior Restraint on Commercial Speech Case】 Are Article 24, Paragraph 2 of the Statute for Control of Hygiene and Safety of Cosmetics and its punishment as provided in Article 30, Paragraph 1 of the same Statute unconstitutional?
77.)中華民國 105 年 12 月 30 日 院台大二字第1050033581號No.743【Whether Lands Expropriated for the Mass Rapid Transit System May be Used for Joint Development Plan】 Whether lands expropriated for the mass rapid transit system may be used for joint development plan?
78.)中華民國 105 年 12 月 09 日 院台大二字第1050031469號No.742【Challenging Urban Plan Modifications based on Periodic Comprehensive Review】 Is it permitted to challenge by filing an administrative appeal or initiating court proceedings in an administrative court a specific part of an urban plan modification based on a periodic Comprehensive Review of the urban plan, if that specific part either directly restricts the rights and privileges of specific individuals within a certain region or of an identifiable group of individuals, or imposes additional obligations on such individuals?
79.)中華民國 105 年 11 月 11 日 院台大二字第1050028715號No.741【Scope of original cases eligible for extraordinary remedies under Interpretations declaring laws unconstitutional but valid for a prescribed period of time】 When an individual applies to this Court for an Interpretation of the Constitution and this Court declares a statute or regulation that has been applied by the court of last instance in its final judgment or ruling to be unconstitutional but invalid only after expiry of a prescribed period of time, may the applicant rely on the Interpretation rendered by this Court to seek a retrial of the case or other redress? May the Prosecutor General rely on the Interpretation rendered by this Court to make an extraordinary appeal?
80.)中華民國 105 年 10 月 21 日 院台大二字第1050026814號No.740【The Nature of Insurance Solicitor’s Service Contract】 Whether a service contract for the solicitation of insurance business between an insurance solicitor and the insurance company to which the solicitor belongs is a labor contract under Article 2 Sub-paragraph 6 of the Labor Standards Act?
81.)民國46年3月22日No.74 May a delegate of the National Assembly serve concurrently as a delegate of the provincial and county/hsien council?
82.)中華民國 105 年 07 月 29 日 院台大二字第1050019721號No.739【Review Involving Self-implemented Urban Land Consolidation】 Is the requirement set forth in Article 8, Paragraph 1 of the Regulation for Encouraging Landowners to Handle Urban Land Consolidation (hereinafter “the Encouraging Consolidation Regulation”) to apply for the approval of organizing a preparatory committee by the initiators constitutional? Are the provisions set forth in Article 9, Subparagraph 3 and Article 20, Paragraph 1 of the Regulation which mandate that the preparatory committee shall apply for the approval of the proposed consolidation range, Article 9, Subparagraph 6 and Article 26, Paragraph 1 of the same Regulation which mandate that the preparatory committee shall apply for the approval of the consolidation project, publicly announce, and notify to the landowners constitutional? Are the procedures under the same Regulation regarding that the competent authorities approve the proposed consolidation range and grant a permission to implement the consolidation project constitutional? Is the ratio for reaching an agreement set forth in Article 58, Paragraph 3 of the Equalization of Land Rights Act constitutional?
83.)中華民國 105 年 06 月 24 日 院台大二字第1050016544號No.738【Limitation of Distance Involving Electronic Gaming Arcades】 Is it constitutional for Point 2, Section 1, Subsection 1 of the Operating Procedures on the Issuance of Electronic Gaming Arcade Classification Identification for the Electronic Gaming Industry to stipulate that the operating facilities of electronic gaming arcades shall be in compliance with the Self-governing Ordinance? Is it constitutional for Article 5, Paragraph 1, Section 2 of the Taipei City Electronic Gaming Arcades Installation and Management Self-governing Ordinance, Article 4, Paragraph 1 of the Taipei County Electronic Gaming Arcades Installation Self-governing Ordinance (now invalid), and Article 4, Paragraph 1 of the Taoyuan County Electronic Gaming Arcades Installation Self-governing Ordinance (continuously in effect as of December 25, 2014 by promulgation) to respectively regulate that an electronic gaming arcade should maintain a distance of 1,000, 990 or 800 meters away from certain locations?
84.)中華民國 105 年 04 月 29 日 院台大二字第1050011308號No.737【Access to Dossier Information in the Process of Detention Hearing at Investigatory Stage】 Is it unconstitutional that the criminal suspect and his or her counsel only have access to factual issues cited in the detention motion at investigatory stage according to Article 33 Paragraph 1 and Article 101 Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Code?
85.)中華民國 105 年 03 月 18 日 No.736【Public School Teachers’ Right to Judicial Remedy Against Infringements by Schools Case】 Is Article 33 of the Teachers Act unconstitutional? Does a teacher have the right to bring an administrative suit against his/her school’s specific administrative actions?
86.)中華民國 105 年 02 月 04 日 No.735【No-confidence Motion Proposed during the Extraordinary Session】 Is a no-confidence motion stipulated under Article 3, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 3 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of China permitted to be proposed during an extraordinary session of the Legislative Yuan convened due to other specific matters?
87.)中華民國 104 年 12 月 18 日 No.734【Recognizing placement of advertisements as an act of environmental pollution】 The Waste Disposal Act authorizes competent authorities to publish the types of act which could be characterized as an act of environmental pollution. Is it consistent with the Constitution to regard the official notices published thereunder, recognizing the unapproved placement of advertisements in designated areas and by a designated manner as an act of pollution?
88.)中華民國 104 年 10 月 30 日 No.733【Case regarding the selection of a chairperson in a professional association】 Does the Section 2 of Article 17 of the Civil Associations Act regarding“ A chair person shall be elected from the standing directors by the vote of directors and, if no such position of standing directors is set, then selection shall be made by the vote among the directors.”violate the Constitution?
89.)中華民國 104 年 09 月 25 日 No.732【Expropriation of Lands Adjacent to Mass Rapid Transit System Facilities】 Is it unconstitutional that the provisions at issue allow competent authorities to expropriate adjacent lands, which are not necessarily required for transportation, in accordance with applicable laws for the purpose of land development?
90.)中華民國 104 年 07 月 31 日 No.731【Case concerning the starting date of application for compensation in land, rather than cash, in cases of zone expropriation】 If the portion of the Contested Requirement, which stipulates that those who wish to apply for compensation in land in lieu of cash “shall within the period of the public announcement of the expropriation” submit their application, is unconstitutional, because the date of the public announcement of the expropriation is used to calculate the period during which individuals who are served a written notice of expropriation issued after that date may apply?
91.)中華民國 104 年 06 月 18 日 No.730【Calculation of the number of years working for government for the pension of public school teachers and employees who retired but were later hired by the government again】 Is Article 19, Section 2 of the Implementing Regulations of the Act Governing the Retirement of Public School Teachers and Employees unconstitutional?
92.)民國46年3月13日No.73 Shall an employee working for a state-owned company be recognized as a public servant and still hold official status before assignment to the private sector after a schedule of privatization has been initiated?
93.)中華民國 104 年 05 月 01 日 No.729【Legislative Yuan’s power to request investigation files】 Can the Legislative Yuan request investigation files held by the Prosecution?
94.)中華民國 104 年 03 月 20 日 No.728【Qualifications for Successors of Ancestor Worship Guilds Case】 The Act Regarding Ancestor Worship Guilds provides that the qualifications of successors of ancestor worship guilds established before the promulgation of the Act shall abide by their guild charters. Are such provisions of the Act constitutional?
95.)中華民國 104 年 02 月 06 日 No.727【Case concerning the nullification of the rights and interests of resident military householders who disagree with the reconstruction of villages of old military dependents】 Is the rule that authorizes the competent authority to nullify the resident certificates and related rights and interests of resident military householders who disagree with the reconstruction of old military dependents’ villages unconstitutional?
96.)中華民國 103 年 11 月 21 日 No.726【Legal Effect of Separate Labor-Management Agreement without Filing for Approval and Record under Article 84-1 of the Labor Standards Act】 Is a separate labor-management agreement for working hours and other issues without filing for approval and record subject to the restrictions under the Labor Standards Act?
97.)中華民國 103 年 10 月 24 日 No.725【The Effects of an Interpretation that Declares a Statute or Regulation Unconstitutional but Invalid Only after a Prescribed Period of Time on Cases for Which the Interpretation Was Sought】 An Interpretation that declares a statute or regulation unconstitutional but invalid only after a period of time currently has no effect on cases for which the Interpretation was sought. Is this unconstitutional?
98.)中華民國 103 年 08 月 01 日 No.724【Civil Association Being Set a Time Limit for Correction】 Is the provision of the Enforcement Regulations for the Supervision and Guidance of Civil Association of All Levels which specifies that the directors and supervisors of a civil association which has been set a time limit for correction shall cease exercising their powers and authorities unconstitutional?
99.)中華民國 103 年 07 月 25 日 No.723【The Period for Declaring National Health Insurance Medical Service Points】 Is it unconstitutional to promulgate regulations to prescribe the two-year period for declaring National Health Insurance Medical Service Points?
100.)民國103年6月27日No.722【Case concerning solo professional practitioners to adopt accrual basis accounting to calculate income】 Is the relevant provision of Regulations Governing Business Income from Professional Practice which only permits the adoption of accrual accounting for professional joint practitioners or professional associations collecting and disbursing on behalf of members unconstitutional?
Go to top